Strata · Lot Works Review

Assessment of
renovation applications.

Independent reports for owners corporations, strata committees and managing agents.

Since July 2025, a strata committee that does not refuse a minor renovation in writing within three months has approved it. We assess what a proposal will do to the building and what approvals it needs, and report to the owners corporation. Five business days.

Where would you like to start?

Who reads your plans

Spicer Architecture has spent twenty years working in Class 2 buildings — apartment renovations, heritage conversions and remedial work across Sydney’s older stock. We know what a moved wet area does to the slab below, because we have detailed it, documented it and built it.

Jonathan Spicer
Director · Architect
Registered
Architect
New South Wales 8851 · Australian Capital Territory 2959 · Victoria VIC00291
Design
Practitioner
Registered Design Practitioner — ArchitecturalDesign and Building Practitioners Act 2020 (NSW)
Principal
Design Prac.
Registered Principal Design PractitionerDesign and Building Practitioners Act 2020 (NSW)
Expert
Witness
Trained in expert witness practice — construction and architecture
Legal
Training
Juris Doctor candidate, completion expected 2027Not an Australian legal practitioner. Spicer Architecture does not provide legal services.
Experience
Twenty years in Class 2 — apartment renovation, heritage conversion and remedial work

Two questions, every time

What will these works do to the building?
The physical consequence — structure, water, sound, services, fire, and the lots above and below.

What else do these works need before they can proceed?
The approval pathway — the statutory category, the consents, the certificates, the consultants and the by-law.

A committee usually gets an answer to neither. Both are set out below.

What the assessment covers

The building

What the works will actually do to the fabric, and to the people living above and below.

  • Slab penetrations, and where the lot boundary sits against common property
  • Wet areas over habitable rooms, waterproofing, and the consequence of failure
  • Structural implications and load paths
  • Acoustic impact and floor covering performance
  • Services relocation, riser access and capacity
  • Fire separation and egress
  • Effect on the building's existing systems, and on adjoining and neighbouring lots

The approval pathway

Everything the works will need before they can lawfully proceed — most of which never appears in the application.

  • Classification against the statutory categories — cosmetic work, minor renovation, or work requiring a special resolution — and the approval each part of the proposal takes
  • Development consent or a CDC — whether council approval is likely to be required, and on what pathway
  • Construction certificate — whether one is required, and therefore whether regulated designs and design compliance declarations under the Design and Building Practitioners Act are triggered
  • Heritage — whether the building or an item within it is listed, whether a standard exemption applies, and whether separate heritage consent or endorsement is needed
  • Certifier and consultants — whether a certifier, structural engineer, hydraulic or acoustic consultant needs to be engaged, and at what point in the sequence
  • Works by-law — whether one is required and what it needs to control, set out for the scheme’s solicitor to draft
  • The scheme’s own by-laws — whether they impose requirements beyond the statutory minimum
The category an application falls into and the consequence it carries for the building are two different questions. Most disputes come from assuming they are the same one.

Work can be a minor renovation in statutory terms — decided by the committee on an ordinary resolution — and still put a new wet area over someone’s bedroom, load a riser that is already at capacity, or breach a fire separation. It can equally look alarming on a drawing and turn out to be cosmetic work needing no approval at all.

The statutory category tells the committee how to decide. It says nothing about what it is deciding. We report on both, separately and plainly, so the committee can see where a technically minor application carries a consequence worth conditioning — and where an alarming-looking one does not.

Classification and pathway findings are architectural and regulatory assessments, not legal advice. Where a question turns on the construction of the scheme’s by-laws or on legal rights and obligations, we identify it and refer it to the scheme’s solicitor.
We assess. The owners corporation decides. Nothing in our report approves anything — only the owners corporation can do that.

Our reports set out findings, risks and recommended conditions so the committee can make its decision on the record. Where a matter is legal rather than architectural, we say so and refer it to the scheme’s solicitor.